Timeline for Is Nautilus really "not-recommended"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 13:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://elementaryos.stackexchange.com/ with https://elementaryos.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 19, 2015 at 0:12 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=170 by developer User.Id=8 | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 4:56 | answer | added | Daniel Foré | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 16, 2015 at 0:36 | comment | added | quassy | That is only meant to say placing files on your desktop via nautilus is not recommended, which is also hear-say though. | |
| Jul 11, 2015 at 21:53 | comment | added | user170 | @DanielForé - this answer says so, and I ask also because I also have some doubts about using Nautilus. e.g. it takes over my Firefox integration and that I cannot fix. Maybe I'll ask a new question on that too ;) | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 17:50 | comment | added | Daniel Foré | I guess a follow up question is where did you hear it wasn't recommended? Maybe someone can investigate in that context | |
| Jul 9, 2015 at 16:36 | history | edited | user3 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| Jul 9, 2015 at 16:12 | history | edited | Gabriel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Jul 9, 2015 at 15:04 | history | edited | user170 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 28 characters in body
|
| Jul 9, 2015 at 14:51 | history | asked | user170 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |